<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/search_rss">
  <title>Oxfam America</title>
  <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 1 to 3.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/oa.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/people-centered-resilience"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/chile-struggling-for-the-right-to-decide"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/spring-2002"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/people-centered-resilience">        <title>People-centered resilience</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/people-centered-resilience</link>        <description>Working with vulnerable farmers towards climate change adaptation and food security</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Globally, 1.7 billion farmers are highly vulnerable to climate change impacts. The many who are already hungry are particularly vulnerable. World hunger currently stands at 1.02 billion people, its highest level ever. Yet scaling up localised ‘resilience’ successes offers hope for these farmers, while helping to address the climate problem. New thinking to recognize vulnerable farmers as critical partners in delivering solutions is needed to increase their resilience and to enable them to help combat climate change. Bold new public investment to the supporting institutions will be needed.</p>
<p>Achieving farm resilience requires building up the resilience of vulnerable farmers by developing their skills, expertise and voice while supporting their use of agro-ecological farming practices. Building resilience depends not just on how farmers manage resources, but on how well local, national, and global institutions support farmers. Agro-ecological practices can empower vulnerable small-scale farmers, offering them both greater control over their lives and an accessible means of improving their food security, while decreasing their risk of crop failure or livestock death due to climate shocks. Vulnerable farmers can use agro-ecological practices to build resilient farms and improve their livelihoods, achieving multiple benefits: 1.  improved food security; 2. adaptation to a changing climate; and 3. mitigation of climate change.</p>
<p>People-centred resilience consists of five principles which should guide how investments in vulnerable farming communities are designed and implemented. They are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Restored and diversified natural resources for sustainability.</li>
<li>Responsive institutions grounded in local context.</li>
<li>Expanded and improved sustainable livelihood options.</li>
<li>Sound gender dynamics and gender equality.</li>
<li>Farmer-driven decisions.</li></ol>
<p>Following these principles ensures that investments support farmers in their efforts to become food-secure and adapt to climate change. Four institutions central to delivering people-centered resilience are: secure land rights; dynamic farmer associations; responsive agricultural advisory services; and public support for environmental services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Central America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Central and East Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Central and South Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>East Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Horn of Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Middle East</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>South America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Southern Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>West Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>adaptation</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>food security</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>hunger</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>land</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>livelihood</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>microinsurance</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>water</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>weather insurance</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2011-06-08T14:58:44Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Briefing Paper</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/chile-struggling-for-the-right-to-decide">        <title>Chile: Struggling for the right to decide</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/chile-struggling-for-the-right-to-decide</link>        <description>Farmers use the law to defend their water and their rights—but can't block a massive tailings dam.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Chile is often described as mining's great "success story."  It's a country that has used its massive copper reserves to reduce poverty and promote economic development. And yet even in Chile, where mining is credited with doing so much good, Chilean mining companies continue to violate the basic rights of local communities.</p>
<p>In the arid north of the country, where the government has prioritized copper mining, farmers and copper mines struggle to co-exist. Both need water, but the major copper mines, with support from the government and plenty of capital, are buying up the water rights. Farmers, many poor and without powerful friends in the government, are seeing their rivers and streams dry up—or worse, become so polluted they can't use the water.</p>
<p>In  2004, the 2,000 residents of Caimanes, a remote town in Chile's IV Region, faced an additional challenge: a massive tailings dam Pelambres Mining Company built on their doorstep. The dam, which collects waste rock from dissolved copper, would allow the Las Pelambres mine to continue operating for an additional 28 years.  And the new tailings dam, when full, will hold 1.7 billion tons of waste.</p>
<p>Despite this huge new source of pollution to their water sources, local people had few outlets to defend their rights. Chile has no provisions in its laws on mining that require any citizen participation in approving or authorizing any expansion of existing mining operations.</p>
<p>But farmers in Caimanes and several other villages continued to voice their concerns that the dam would destroy an entire valley and cut off their supply of water. They said that acid will drain out of the dam, polluting what water that remains, and endangering the one stream that provides their town with water. Tailings dams are also usually a source of dust particles containing heavy metals—these can blow into town and poison people and their animals.</p>
<p>Caimanes is in the poorest region of Chile. Farmers there are concerned about their ability to continue to earn a living, but are also aware that a major earthquake could collapse the dam. This has happened before: In 1965 an earthquake spilled 10 million cubic meters (350 million cubic feet) of mine waste out of a similar holding area and killed 200 people.</p>
<h3>Community response</h3>
<p>In 2004 community members in Caimanes began working with the Environmental Oversight Office (the Fiscalía del Medio Ambiente or FIMA, a Chilean NGO). They gathered signatures on petitions and filed them in legal courts and requested an injunction to halt construction of the tailings dam. In 2005 the Caimanes community group representing farmers in the area alleged that the permit process for the dam had not been followed properly and that there were archeological sites that were being damaged in the construction. In 2007 a local court in the nearby city of Los Vilos ordered that the mine company halt construction of the tailings dam.</p>
<h3>Government and company response</h3>
<p>The Las Pelambres mine company appealed the 2007 court order, and the decision put responsibility on a government water commission. This commission had already approved a permit for the construction of the tailings dam, with limited participation from local farmers, so it allowed construction to continue. In 2008 the Chile's supreme court ruled that the right to water for the farmers affected by the tailings dam was being violated, and awarded each of the farmers $40,000. In December 2008 the company announced that it had finished the tailings dam.</p>
<h3>Oxfam involvement</h3>
<p>Oxfam America provided grant funding for FIMA to help the citizens of Caimanes to defend their rights in court, and raise awareness about their situation among people in Chile. FIMA advocated for a hearing at the Latin American Water Tribunal in 2007, which issued a statement calling for the dam construction to be stopped and the citizens compensated. FIMA has also published reports about the situation in Caimanes and prompted considerable coverage of this case in the international media.</p>
<p>Although the citizens of Caimanes did win compensation and a favorable judgment in court, they did not succeed in blocking the dam construction. "Unfortunately for the people, there are no winners," says a report published by FIMA, The Battle for Water in the Pupío Valley. "This compensation will not make up for the destruction of the quality of life in the valley." FIMA says in the report that the people achieved a "legal and economic victory, but a social and environmental defeat."</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the case sets an important precedent and provides an example to the global mining industry of how responsible companies should <em>not</em> operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>water</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>South America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>oil, gas and mining</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>natural resources</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Chile</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-05T17:04:15Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/spring-2002">        <title>OXFAMExchange Spring 2002</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/spring-2002</link>        <description>Oxfam launches the Make Trade Fair campaign</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>On April 11, in a noise heard far beyond the borders of the Hong Kong harbor, Oxfam crushed a shipping container emblazoned with various trade injustices that Oxfam is fighting to abolish.</p>
<p>Amid cheers from a throng of enthusiastic supporters and international media, Make Trade Fair won the day.</p>
<p>Oxfam's trade campaign was launched.</p>
<p>Within hours of the Hong Kong debut, events were held in 25 cities including Brussels, Dublin, Geneva, Mexico City, San Salvador, and Washington, D.C. These events ranged from press conferences and symposiums to a rock concert in London’s Trafalgar Square.</p>
<p>Oxfam's trade campaign seeks to unite concerned citizens around the world in calling for fair trade policies that will help move millions of people out of poverty.</p>
<p>Nobel Prize Professor Amartya Sen, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and musician and social activist Bono were among those who endorsed the campaign. "Oxfam has got it right," said Bono. "It wouldn't cost much to change the rules of trade so that poor countries can work their way out of poverty. But the world's leaders won't act unless they hear enough people telling them."</p>
<p>Also in this issue of EXCHANGE, writers Frances and Anna Lappé discuss their book <em>Hope's Edge: The Next Diet for a Small Planet</em>, and we bring you updates on Oxfam's work with water and sanitation, drought in Ethiopia, and indigenous women in the highlands of Peru who are speaking out after decades of violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>CHANGE</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Cambodia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Central America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>East Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>El Salvador</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Peru</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>South America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Southern Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>equality for women</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>indigenous people</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>minority rights</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>natural disaster</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>public health</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>water</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-04-30T21:11:13Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Oxfam Exchange</dc:type>    </item>



</rdf:RDF>
