<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/search_rss">
  <title>Oxfam America</title>
  <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 1 to 1.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/oa.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-right-to-survive"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-right-to-survive">        <title>The Right to Survive</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-right-to-survive</link>        <description>The humanitarian challenge for the twenty-first century</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<link href="file://localhost/Users/elizabethlucas/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/msoclip/0clip_filelist.xml" rel="File-List">
<p>
</p>
<style>
&amp;amp;lt;!--
 /* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:Arial;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;
	mso-font-charset:0;
	mso-generic-font-family:auto;
	mso-font-pitch:variable;
	mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
	mso-font-charset:0;
	mso-generic-font-family:auto;
	mso-font-pitch:variable;
	mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}
 /* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{mso-style-parent:"";
	margin-top:0in;
	margin-right:0in;
	margin-bottom:10.0pt;
	margin-left:0in;
	line-height:115%;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;
	text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-noshow:yes;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;
	text-underline:single;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
	mso-header-margin:.5in;
	mso-footer-margin:.5in;
	mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
--&amp;amp;gt;
</style>
<p>




</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: April 2011</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This note is to briefly explain why Oxfam has
revised its view of its 2009 forecast of a likely rise in the number of people
affected by climate-related disasters.</em>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Two years ago Oxfam
did an analysis of the number of people affected by past climate-related
events. From this analysis we made a forecast that by 2015 it was likely that
the average annual number of people affected by climate-related disasters would
be 375 million and this represented an increase of 54 per cent compared with
the average figure of the decade 1998-2007.</p>
<p>Having reviewed
the data and the method we used to analyse the data we are no longer confident
in the specific approach we used, given the nature of the data, as described
below, and so we are no longer confident of this specific forecast.</p>
<p>Our concerns
are essentially two-fold: the limitations of the data and the limitations of
the way we analysed the data.</p>
<p><strong>The limitations of the data</strong>: The data we
used was from EM-DAT, the international disaster database managed by CRED, the
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. This is a respected set
of data which captures, amongst other things, the number of disasters that has
happened and the number of people affected.</p>
<p>Like most sets
of data it has its limitations. In EM-DAT’s case one of the key limitations is
that the more recent data is more reliable. This was well known to us and we
dealt with this in our analysis by using double exponential smoothing on the
data (see the explanation of <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/policy/climate_change/people-affected-by-natural-disasters.html">how
we carried out the analysis and catered for the data’s limitation</a>).</p>
<p>However one
limitation we did not know at the time and have only recently discovered is
that the number of people affected by climate-related disasters in China is
unusually low in first half of the 1980s when compared with subsequent years. It
is highly likely that this is the result of under reporting from China. Given
the size of China’s population its disaster figures are significant when considering
the global picture. The likely impact of this on our forecast may mean that we
started our analysis with data from 1980 that was likely to be unreasonably low
and therefore made our projected increase in the number of people affected artificially
high.</p>
<p>We now know
that there has been a significant increase in reporting from many other
countries over the same period due to better information and communication.</p>
<p><strong>Limitations of our analysis: </strong>Though we were
clear in our explanation of the way we came to our conclusion that “different forecasting models could lead to different
results,” what we should have done, particularly given the high volatility of
the data especially in 2002, was run these different models to help determine
the degree of confidence in the conclusion we came to.</p>
<p><u>It
does not mean though that there will not be an increase in the numbers of
people affected by disasters in the future</u>. There is
evidence to point to this likelihood.</p>
<p>According
to EM-DAT the number of climate-related disasters has increased by 35 per cent
from the 1990s to the 2000s. Floods have increased by 50 per cent over the same
period. Munich Re’s database of global disasters also shows an increasing trend
in climate-related events. It is not possible to know how much of this is an
increase in events or better reporting of events and neither can we assume that
an increase in events will lead to an equal increase in numbers affected.</p>
<p>Population
growth means that there is a likelihood of more people being affected by
climate-related events.</p>
<p>The
number of people exposed to some climate-related events is also on the
increase. According to the forthcoming United Nations Global Assessment Report
2011 the number of people exposed to floods and cyclones has doubled between
1970 and 2010. It is likely that many people who are ‘exposed’ to hazards are
not affected due to measures that protect them, such as flood defences for
example. However in many vulnerable countries investment and efforts to reduce
significantly the risk of disasters is sorely lacking leaving millions exposed
and likely to be affected by disasters.</p>
<p>Finally
as the effects of climate change become more apparent there are more frequent
and more intense climate-related events according to the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Oxfam
is in the process of further research into the number of people affected by
climate-related events and will be publishing the results of this research in
due course.</p>
<p>

</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>natural disaster</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>human rights</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>aid reform</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>humanitarian relief</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>disaster risk reduction</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2011-06-09T20:00:59Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Research Report</dc:type>    </item>



</rdf:RDF>
