<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/search_rss">
  <title>Oxfam America</title>
  <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 81 to 95.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/oa.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-the-drumbeat-on-development"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-our-commitments"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/g8-pledge-just-the-beginning"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/what-happened-in-hong-kong"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/fish-trade-food-and-income-security"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/notes-from-the-big-show"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/blood-on-the-floor"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/truth-or-consequences"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/africa-and-the-doha-round"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/oxfam-in-south-america"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/farmers-in-the-us-speak-out"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/an-energizing-experience"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/djimon-hounsou-learns-how-us-subsidies-affect-africa"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/congressional-testimony-the-implementation-of-dr-cafta"/>
        
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-coffee-crisis-continues"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>

    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-the-drumbeat-on-development">        <title>Keeping the drumbeat on development</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-the-drumbeat-on-development</link>        <description>Through the Big Noise petition, more than 17.8 million signatures strong, Oxfam campaigners built up pressure before the WTO meeting in Hong Kong.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Oxfam's Make Trade Fair team counted more than 17.8 million signatures for the <a href="http://www.maketradefair.com/">Big Noise petition</a> this December, blowing away a previous year-end goal of 10 million signatures. The petition calls on the world's decision-makers to change the rules of trade so they help, not hurt, poor communities.</p>
<p>On Dec. 12, the eve of the World Trade Organization's week-longMinisterial meeting, a delegation of celebrities including Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal, singer Angelique Kidjou, from Benin, and Chinese rockstar Anthony Wong handed over the petition to Pascal Lamy, Director General of the WTO.</p>
<p>The group of celebrities reflect the diverse originsof Big Noise signatures, which have poured in from around the world, with large numbers coming from developing countries such as India, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, and Zambia.</p>
<p>Rich countries have made a significant contribution as well. Through a variety of grassroots methods, in almost every state in the country, Oxfam America helped gather about 220,000 signatures within the US.</p>
<h3>What a Big Noise looks like</h3>
<p>Organizers in California, Kansas, Chicago, Virginia, and Boston gathered signatures as part of their work promoting a cap on US agriculture subsidies, which could help reduce poverty for millions of small-scale farmers.</p>
<p>About 1,000 volunteers gathered signatures while talking with audience members at Coldplay, REM, Youssou N'Dour and Habib Koité concerts, and conferences and expos such as the Green Festival and Fair Trade Futures conference.</p>
<p>Student activists at universities around the country, including Oxfam America-trained CHANGE leaders established fair trade clubs on their campuses, participated in a traveling fair trade Road Show, and staged talks and teach-ins this fall and during the Global Week of Action in April.</p>
<p>And roughly 85,000 online activists signed up to the Big Noise, either by logging onto <a href="http://www.maketradefair.com/">www.maketradefair.com</a> and through e-mail actions from Oxfam.</p>
<p>These efforts supported trade campaigns around the world.</p>
<h3>Why it matters</h3>
<p>Just this month, actor Colin Firth met with European Union Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson in Brussels. He, along with Oxfam campaigners and a Chinese dragon, reminded the commissioner of the upcoming World Trade Organization meeting in Hong Kong, where development represents a key issue on the agenda. More than 70 journalists turned up for the event.</p>
<p>Firth said: "What is an actor doing here? There are millions of people more qualified than me—the 10 million names on the Big Noise petition ... I'm here as a name, a European, and a consumer. These are the voices I give to Mr. Mandelson to take to Hong Kong."</p>
<p>And in West Africa, where small-scale farmers have been devastated by US overproduction of cotton crops, campaigners reported gathering more than 2.7 million signatures for the Big Noise—an extraordinary achievement.</p>
<p>Oxfam will keep a steady drumbeat going throughout the WTO meeting Dec. 13 to 18.</p>
<p>"For millions of people, trade is a life or death issue. This is the first opportunity many have been given to voice their concerns," said Brian Rawson, Trade Campaign Organizer at Oxfam America.</p>
<p>The Make Trade Fair team also plans on presenting the petition to US decision-makers gathered in Hong Kong.</p>
<p>"The delivery of the Big Noise in Hong Kong will bring the collective power of these voices right into the negotiating halls of the WTO."</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Oxfam America</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>East Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-14T06:34:24Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-our-commitments">        <title>Keeping our commitments</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/keeping-our-commitments</link>        <description>Raymond C. Offenheiser, president of Oxfam America, describes what was at stake at the December '06 WTO meeting in Hong Kong.
</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Four years ago, the world's most developed countries made a commitment to help the world's least developed countries by making global trade work. The clock is ticking but less than a week before crucial W.T.O negotiations are scheduled to begin in Hong Kong, it appears that this chance may be slipping away.</p>
<p>The U.S has taken some steps in the right direction. The President spoke unequivocally about the need to cut trade distorting agricultural subsidies during his speech to the UN General Assembly this past fall and Secretary of Agriculture Johanns and US Trade Representative Robert Portman have echoed the President's position. American negotiators have put new proposals on the table attempting to restart the stalled negotiations. But, it is still not enough to deliver on the promises of a "development round" and lift millions of people out of poverty.</p>
<p>The Doha Round of trade negotiation was supposed to change the dynamics on trade. Launched in 2001, negotiators announced that this trade round would put the interests of developing countries at the heart of the effort. But four years later, the negotiations have stalled and development concerns are sliding to the bottom of the agenda.</p>
<p>For the more than 2.5 billion people in the world that rely on agriculture for their livelihood, Hong Kong is more than a meeting of diplomats - it is an opportunity to meaningfully improve their lives. Throughout the world, poverty is concentrated in rural areas, with more than a billion people living on less than $1 a day. The average cotton farmer in Mali earns about $400 a year from the entire cotton crop. Between 2001 and 2003, Oxfam estimates that West African countries, including Mali, lost over $400 million dollars because US subsidies depressed global cotton prices. The backbone of Mali's economy, providing employment for more than 3 million people, falls victim to rules that have permitted rich countries to benefit for decades from dumping subsidized cotton. By leveling the playing field, we could have a massive impact on poverty reduction.</p>
<p>The Doha Round promised developing countries that it would do things differently, that the development of poor nations would occupy center stage. What that means is drastic cuts in agricultural subsidies and offers of market access for developing countries. But this will require that leaders of the U.S., EU and Japan see a greater good for both developing nations and their own citizens. In the US, it means envisioning a new era for American farmers that shifts subsidies from anachronistic, trade distorting support payments to new programs that support sustainable rural livelihoods and stewardship.</p>
<p>President Bush has delivered the right message on cutting subsidies. But the opportunity to lift millions out of poverty through fair trade rules still lies far out of reach. The US should take the lead and demonstrate to the rest of the world that we believe in the power of trade to change lives, and that we care about the lives of farmers in the US and abroad. Two and half billion people are watching and waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Raymond C. Offenheiser</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>politics and government</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-04-27T23:05:53Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/g8-pledge-just-the-beginning">        <title>G8 pledge just the beginning</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/g8-pledge-just-the-beginning</link>        <description>Oxfam, ONE campaign will continue to push to Make Poverty History.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Leaders of the world's eight richest countries promised $50 billion in aid to Africa in early July. And while the pledge fell short of the hopes of millions around the world, the leaders of the G8 delivered some welcome progress. They recognized that this is the beginning, not the end, of their efforts to overcome poverty.</p>
<p>This breakthrough is a result of your actions. Americans from all walks of life participated in the <a href="http://www.one.org">ONE Campaign</a>—to show the leaders of the G8 that we must make poverty history by making trade fair, canceling the debt, and increasing global aid. As part of the ONE campaign, Oxfam America brought more than 70 people to Live 8 Philadelphia, one of eight concerts held around the world in the name of Making Poverty History.</p>
<p>Five of Oxfam’s Live 8 volunteers continued on to Edinburgh, Scotland, where they joined Africans, Italians, French, Germans, and other delegates in calling on the G8 leaders to Make Poverty History. Oscar-nominated actor Djimon Hounsou was among Oxfam America's ONE delegates in Edinburgh.</p>
<p>"I'm proud to be here with the many activists that have come from the US and many other countries around the world," Hounsou said. "Having just returned from Mali, where I met cotton farmers struggling to live on less than a dollar a day, I was moved to do anything I can to bring attention to their plight."</p>
<p>Today, over a billion people live on less than a dollar a day. One child dies every three seconds as a result of extreme poverty. And while the aid pledged at the G8 meetings will help overcome poverty, much more is needed. And Oxfam, as part of the ONE campaign, will continue to push for more change in the effort to Make Poverty History.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Oxfam America</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>G8</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Make Trade Fair</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-14T06:34:22Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>News Update</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/what-happened-in-hong-kong">        <title>What happened in Hong Kong?</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/what-happened-in-hong-kong</link>        <description>Initial analysis of the WTO Ministerial, December 2005</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>The WTO Hong Kong ministerial meeting was a lost opportunity to make trade fairer for poor people around the world. Rich countries put their commercial interests before those of developing countries. Most of the difficult decisions were put off to a further meeting in early 2006, but it is far from clear why rich countries that were unable to show the necessary leadership in Hong Kong will behave any differently in a few months’ time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T22:53:12Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Briefing Paper</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/fish-trade-food-and-income-security">        <title>Fish Trade, Food, and Income Security</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/fish-trade-food-and-income-security</link>        <description>An overview of the constraints and barriers faced by small-scale fishers, farmers, and traders in the Lower Mekong Basin</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>As riparian governments advoate freer trade and develop physical infrastructure, trade networks, including for aquatic living animals, trade will likely become more efficient through largers investment by fewer traders. Whether this trade efficiency and economic growth are accompanied with a progressive distributional change, among farmers and fishers, is currently under debate. Without a clearer policy agenda that reflects the diversity and social nature of fish trade relations at the local levels, the ability of fishers, farmers, and traders to secure their food and income may be compromised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Cambodia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>East Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>agriculture</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T22:56:46Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Research Report</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/notes-from-the-big-show">        <title>Notes from the Big Show</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/notes-from-the-big-show</link>        <description>Oxfam America's Gawain Kripke traveled to Hong Kong for the World Trade Organization's meeting in December.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Welcome to Hong Kong! Government ministers from more than 140 countries, hundreds of journalists, thousands of lobbyists, and uncounted numbers of farmers, students, and trade justice activists, are convening on this city for the 6th ministerial conference of the World Trade Organization.</p>
<p>Big international meetings like this are huge undertakings and almost always take on a feeling of a many-ringed circus. There are many side shows and a dizzying array of strange and interesting events.</p>
<p>But at the center of it all, remains an important focus: the world's governments have come together to negotiate trade rules. Rich countries and poor countries, big and small, have gathered to see if they can hammer out a new global trade agreement.</p>
<p>This "round" of negotiations was launched four years ago in Doha, Qatar—hence it's called the "Doha Round." The explicit purpose of the negotiations was to help developing countries gain more from the global trading system. Currently, trade is dominated by rich countries. Less than 20 percent of the world's population captures 80 percent of the world's trade. The poorest countries get the least.</p>
<p>Oxfam's mission in Hong Kong is to make sure that the needs of poor people are heard, and that the negotiations reform fundamental inequities in the rules. My job is to try to lobby US officials, talk to US media, and coordinate with our friends from other organizations and activist groups. It’s a lot to manage.</p>
<p>Luckily for me, we have good hosts. Oxfam Hong Kong is doing an extraordinarily good job. As one of the most prominent nonprofit groups in Hong Kong—in fact in all of China—they have a very important role. They are taking the message of Make Trade Fair to the streets of Hong Kong, talking to citizens, teaching, and listening. They have even taken out billboard space on Hong Kong's sparkling subway system</p>
<p>Today we are learning that negotiators are preparing a "development package" of agreements that would help the poorest countries. This is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, these countries really need help. On the other hand, the negotiation will be a failure for development if rich countries can package some small concessions and sell it, rather than undertaking a much deeper reform, particularly of agriculture trade rules. More on that next time.</p>
<p>Must go to bed now. Tomorrow we're expecting to see Oxfam's familiar "big heads"—gigantic fiberglass masks of the leaders of the eight richest countries in the world—doing a fun stunt with some surprise celebrity guests. Also the trade justice movement will stage a large rally and march through the streets of Hong Kong. The negotiations will formally start. And I'll be speaking on a panel on food aid. So the show begins...</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Gawain Kripke</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>East Asia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Make Trade Fair</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-04-28T23:07:12Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/blood-on-the-floor">        <title>Blood on the Floor</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/blood-on-the-floor</link>        <description>﻿How the rich countries have squeezed development out of the WTO Doha negotiations</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Four years on, the Doha Round looks increasingly unlikely to deliver on its promises to the world's poor. Rich countries have sidelined development concerns and insisted on, among other conditions, the "blood on the floor" rule, i.e. obtaining economically painful concessions from all countries, including poor ones. In agriculture, trade rules look set to remain stacked against developing countries and poor farmers. Talks on industrial tariffs could jeopardize the industries of poor countries. If the rich countries fail to significantly improve their offer at the WTO ministerial meeting in Hong Kong in December 2005, developing countries should not be expected to sign on to a bad deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>lmcfarlane</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T22:59:06Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Briefing Paper</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/truth-or-consequences">        <title>Truth or Consequences</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/truth-or-consequences</link>        <description>Why the EU and the US must reform their subsidies or pay the price</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>The USA and the EU are currently blocking a deal to make trade fair in the Doha Development Round. In the wake of findings by the WTO that US cotton subsidies and EU sugar subsidies are illegal, this paper presents powerful new research detailing a slew of other rich country subsidies of $13bn that are also on the wrong side of the law. In addition to the strong moral imperative for the trade superpowers to radically reform the way they subsidise agriculture, there is a also a legal requirement for change. The choice lies with the USA and the EU: either they face manifold legal actions that will force reform on a piecemeal basis, or they negotiate reform upfront in the Doha trade round.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>lmcfarlane</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>agriculture</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T23:00:59Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Briefing Paper</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/africa-and-the-doha-round">        <title>Africa and the Doha Round</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/africa-and-the-doha-round</link>        <description>Fighting to keep development alive</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>As a result of unfair trade rules and falling commodity prices, Africa has suffered terms-of-trade losses and increasing marginalisation. Ten years after the Uruguay Round, the poorest continent on earth, which captures only one per cent of world trade, risks even further losses, despite promises of a ‘development round’ of trade negotiations. This would be a great injustice. There cannot and should not be any new round without an assurance of substantial gains for Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>lmcfarlane</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T23:02:08Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Briefing Paper</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/oxfam-in-south-america">        <title>Oxfam in South America</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/oxfam-in-south-america</link>        <description>To their government officials and to the corporations who want to exploit their lands and natural resources, the indigenous and rural people of South America have a simple, yet important message: "We are here."</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Since 1984, Oxfam America has helped them voice this message in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru—by strengthening farmers' organizations, women's groups, and indigenous associations that represent poor communities. With a stronger voice and the right skills, indigenous and rural people can manage their lands, promote their rights and cultures—and build a better, more prosperous future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Oxfam America</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>natural resources</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>indigenous people</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>disaster risk reduction</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>environment</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>South America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>land</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>oil, gas and mining</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>humanitarian relief</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Peru</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>minority rights</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>women</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Bolivia</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>agriculture</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>transparency</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Ecuador</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>equality for women</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-06-09T20:49:25Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Brochure</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/farmers-in-the-us-speak-out">        <title>Farmers in the US speak out</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/farmers-in-the-us-speak-out</link>        <description>Farmers in the US and Central America had similar concerns about DR-CAFTA.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Meanwhile, Oxfam was also supporting US farming groups, who stood in solidarity with small-scale farmers in Central America.</p>
<p>Groups like the National Family Farm Coalition, the Federation of Southern Cooperatives, the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, and Rural Coalition, carried out direct advocacy of their own, telling their elected officials that trade agreements should protect food sovereignty, not threaten it. Just as the Central Americans wanted to avoid the US flooding their surplus commodities into their market, small-scale American farmers wanted their government to pursue policies that supported them, not the huge agriculture corporations that would benefit from DR-CAFTA.</p>
<p>"This agreement is absolutely horrible for us livestock producers," said Rhonda Perry, a farmer and head of Oxfam partner, Missouri Rural Crisis Center. "It's also not beneficial for farmers in the DR-CAFTA countries. All these promises about export markets, clearly, that's not what happens. There are a few multinational corporations that have no allegiance that make out like bandits. The rest of us are stuck picking up the pieces."</p>
<p>Oxfam America created opportunities for Central and North American farmers to meet, learn from each other, and work together to oppose unfair trade. The National Family Farm Coalition worked with members of Iniciativa CID in Washington, DC to help them bring their concerns directly to members of Congress and share perspectives, farmer to farmer.</p>
<p>"This was really a united front even though people were coming at it from different angles. It was a chance to develop shared understanding about CAFTA's negative impacts on farmer livelihoods in both the US and Central America," said Jaeda Harmon, a US Regional Office Program Officer at Oxfam America</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Chris Hufstader and Andrea Perera</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Central America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>United States</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>agriculture</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-06-08T17:31:44Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/an-energizing-experience">        <title>"An energizing experience"</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/an-energizing-experience</link>        <description>Sharing this experience with some of the most impassioned and successful activists from across the United States refueled my own activist energy.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Participating in the ONE delegation to the G8 Summit was an energizing experience for me.</p>
<p>I came to the delegation committed to fighting poverty wherever it exists. I also came as an Iowa farmer wanting to build solidarity among all farmers.</p>
<p>In Edinburgh, I experienced a global community serious about ending the kind of poverty that kills 30,000 children a day. At the concert in Edinburgh, 40,000 people, enjoying a free concert, stood on their feet and cheered as Bono told the crowd that he'd asked the most powerful world leaders to "spend your money" to end poverty. This powerful connection between democracy and government action reinvigorated my passion to make sure that Americans become part of this historic movement.</p>
<p>The experience of the ONE delegation provided me an opportunity to see the world with more optimistic eyes. Also, sharing this experience with some of the most impassioned and successful activists from across the United States refueled my own activist energy. Home in my office and on my farm, I've already done interviews and continue to share my experiences with family, friends, and colleagues. I will continue to advocate and fight for US agriculture policy that is fairer for farmers in both the developing world and in the rural communities of my own country.</p>
<p>We are living in a historic time. I want every American to understand that the citizens of Earth have the power to end life threatening poverty. I want my fellow Americans to be a part of that historic victory and not spectators. Our democracy and our great wealth give us the power to lead the fight, and I will do all I can to help Americans see the choice each ONE of us is making: to lead or to stand back and watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Matt Russell</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-04-07T23:04:28Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/djimon-hounsou-learns-how-us-subsidies-affect-africa">        <title>Djimon Hounsou learns how US subsidies affect Africa</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/articles/djimon-hounsou-learns-how-us-subsidies-affect-africa</link>        <description>In June 2005, Academy Award-nominated actor Djimon Hounsou took a fact-finding mission to Mali on behalf of Oxfam's Make Trade Fair campaign. Oxfam's Lyndsay Cruz traveled with the actor from Benin and wrote this three-day diary of their trip.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>The price of cotton is plummeting. And not gradually. Every year the price is taking a dramatic turn downwards and cotton farmers around the world are suffering. But not all cotton farmers. Not some of the largest farms on the planet, here in the US, who receive as much as $1 million apiece from the federal government to produce cotton. These farmers are locked into a cushy deal that pays them above the price of production, which drives down the price of cotton around the world. Those who don’t receive subsidies can't turn a profit and are unable to feed their families. Djimon and I wanted to hear about it directly from cotton farmers in West Africa. So we traveled to Mali.</p>
<h3>June 19</h3>
<p>Today Djimon, Sally Baden (Oxfam’s cotton expert extraordinaire) and I drove an hour and a half from Bamako to meet farmers in Fana, a cotton producing village.</p>
<p>When we got there, we sat with 20 of the farmers in their small village and talked with them about how they grow and harvest cotton. It was the beginning of the cotton producing cycle and the farmers had just planted the precious seeds. They said they were waiting for the rain to come. They were worried that if it didn’t come soon they would have to replant.</p>
<p>We could sense the farmers’ anxiety, as we watched them pray and dance to bring on the clouds.</p>
<p>As if out of a movie, the more we talked, the longer they prayed and danced, the darker the skies became. Our host, Keiffa Diarra, a representative to the national union of cotton farmers, laughed and said his new American friends had brought with them a gift—the rain.</p>
<p>Soon enough the farmers got their wish and the skies opened up, drenching us.</p>
<p>We ran like mad to the local school, where students had just finished their academic year, leaving behind their empty benches and desks. Djimon and I huddled together with the locals (farmers, mothers, children, goats), shouting over the lightning and talking about their struggles.</p>
<p>They told us they were barely getting by after the price of cotton plummeted. Just two years ago they were selling at 210 CFA ($.40) a kilo, but these days they get only about 160 CFA ($.31). Most of the farmers only make a profit of about $100 a year. It’s not enough for life’s basic necessities: educating their kids, paying for medication when they are sick, putting food on the table.</p>
<p>Ironically, the rain they prayed and danced for ended up flooding the village. Meanwhile, three wells in the village were incapacitated because of broken pumps. With their dwindling cotton income, the villagers said they couldn’t get enough money together to fix the pumps. That meant they didn’t have clean water, let alone water good enough for drinking.</p>
<p>Soon the rain overwhelmed us. The roads were wet and muddy, but rather than sleep in the dark schoolhouse with no electricity, we decided to try to get out of town.</p>
<p>Rather than speed away, though, we sunk. Both vehicles got stuck about a mile from the main road and we had to call for all the men from the village to help pry us out and push the car to high dry land.</p>
<p>We were filthy and tired and ready to get back to the dry clean hotel. Hopefully tomorrow will be a bit drier.</p>
<h3>June 20</h3>
<p>The next day, stifling heat replaced the rain. We drove almost three hours to the region of Bougouni. There, we were put to work on Modou Diallo’s cotton farm. Modou is also a representative of the national cotton growers union. We turned the soil to prep the land for planting. Djimon steered the hoe while two unruly donkeys pulled it along. It was about 90 degrees Fahrenheit under the blazing sun and we were working very hard. After we turned the soil, Modou explained his current situation to us.</p>
<p>Modou said he only made about $60 last year, after he finished paying off his farming expenses. Djimon was shaken by the conversation. He said he knew that much of the world managed to get by on just $2 a day. Modou and his family were living on just 16 cents.</p>
<p>Djimon said that something had to change. He said we couldn’t continue to look the other way when this kind of poverty is happening hurting so many people. You know something is wrong when the world’s richest countries and the world’s poorest countries are competing in the same market, but the rich countries aren’t playing by the rules that they themselves set.</p>
<h3>June 21</h3>
<p>After a two-hour, bumpy ride along a narrow road, we arrived in Kebila to meet cotton farmers who are cultivating organic and fair trade cotton. They told us that after receiving lower and lower prices each year, they had fallen into debt, which is why they decided to shift into a niche market like organic cotton.</p>
<p>Organic cotton doesn’t allow the expensive pesticides to enable growth but organic fertilizer that the farmers make themselves from the natural resources among them. Though this type of farming is more labor intensive, farmers can save themselves some out-of-pocket expenses by using their own natural resources to make organic fertilizer. They can also sell their cotton at a higher price when it has the organic label.</p>
<p>They felt organic cotton represented was one solution to their growing problems. With cotton prices dropping significantly they knew they either had to adapt, diversify, or eventually lose their land.</p>
<p>Because the demand isn’t as high for organic cotton as conventionally farmed cotton, they were still at a disadvantage, which meant they weren’t selling as much as they used to. But selling at a higher price allowed them to keep their jobs for the time being.</p>
<p>Djimon told the farmers that part of his job as a US citizen would be to start educating the public about organic and fair trade cotton to try to grow the demand. Djimon also promised that he would begin to call on our leaders to address the cotton crisis immediately.</p>
<p>We agreed that though prices fluctuate we must come up with a better system. We must demand a change to the rules of trade, which continue to devastate small farmers everywhere.</p>
<p>Djimon felt the next important step for him to take was to participate in the events going on around the G8 in Scotland. He knew that he could stand in as a representative from Africa who understood the struggles Africans are faced with. He could demand that our world leaders make a historic promise and deliver on it for Africa.</p>
<p>Djimon shared stories about his trip to Mali when he stood alongside the thousands of activists in Scotland from the US, Africa and Europe. At the end of the summit, G8 leaders made important progress for the world’s poorest people, by confirming debt cancellation for 18 highly indebted poor countries in Africa and doubling aid to reach $50 billion by 2010.</p>
<p>However, the outcome from the G8 leaders has fallen short of the hopes of Djimon and the millions around the world campaigning for a momentous breakthrough, especially on trade issues. Although some progress was made on a plan to reform the farm subsidies that keep Africa’s farmers poor, the G8 stopped short of setting an end date for scrapping these damaging subsidies.</p>
<p>Djimon hopes that rich countries will change their negotiating position in the trade talks in the run up to the December Hong Kong WTO ministerial, if people in poor countries are to be given a fair chance to work their way out of poverty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>Lyndsay Cruz</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Make Trade Fair</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>Mali</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>West Africa</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>public figures</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2010-03-01T21:23:11Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Feature Story</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/congressional-testimony-the-implementation-of-dr-cafta">        <title>Congressional Testimony: The Implementation of DR-CAFTA</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/congressional-testimony-the-implementation-of-dr-cafta</link>        <description></description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>The rules set forth in the DR-CAFTA on agriculture, intellectual property, and investment add up to a bad deal for farmers, workers, and consumers in Central America and the Dominican Republic.&nbsp; Rather than setting out provisions that will foster broad-based economic growth and sustainable development, DR-CAFTA will put millions of poor people at risk of losing their livelihood.&nbsp; The US should do better if it wants to promote peace, political stability, and economic security in this region that has struggled with poverty and inequality, and the resulting instability, for so long.&nbsp; Unfortunately, the DR-CAFTA is wrong way to achieve these goals, which is why Oxfam urges Congress to vote no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>Central America</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-04-30T22:33:21Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Research Report</dc:type>    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-coffee-crisis-continues">        <title>The Coffee Crisis Continues</title>        <link>http://www.oxfamamerica.org/publications/the-coffee-crisis-continues</link>        <description>The new Oxfam report assesses the current state of the coffee crisis and calls on the US government to help coffee farmers take full advantage of improved market conditions.</description>        <content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[
<p>Though recent improvements in the international price of coffee provide some relief to small-scale coffee farmers and farm workers, the dynamics of the coffee market leave those at the bottom of the supply chain in a constant state of uncertainty. With a seat at the table in the International Coffee Organization and a commitment to further incorporate coffee-related programs into its development agenda, the US government has the opportunity to take a leadership role in addressing the continuing coffee crisis.</p>
<p>This report assesses the current state of the coffee crisis and calls on the US government to empower small-scale farmers and farm workers to take full advantage of the improved market conditions. With greater access to rural finance, technical assistance programs, and participation in international debate, small-scale, family farmers and farm workers will be less vulnerable to the boom and bust cycles of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>        <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>        <dc:creator>mborum</dc:creator>        <dc:rights></dc:rights>                    <dc:subject>coffee</dc:subject>                    <dc:subject>trade</dc:subject>                <dc:date>2009-05-27T23:04:31Z</dc:date>        <dc:type>Research Report</dc:type>    </item>



</rdf:RDF>
